|
Post by Administrator on Jun 21, 2002 11:34:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by KY Kid on Jun 21, 2002 12:10:36 GMT -5
I'm fine with that ranking, but I do have a question. We were number 4 and Duke was number 3, and they drop, but we stay in the same spot. Why were we leap frogged?
|
|
|
Post by kj on Jun 21, 2002 18:30:49 GMT -5
Didn't Vitale have us top 5 last year? Too many questions imo to be rated this high preseason. Maybe at the end, but I have my doubts all things considered.
|
|
|
Post by Bigbluefan on Jun 21, 2002 20:45:02 GMT -5
I like the ranking, Vitale is using Bogans and Parker to validate this ranking, i go along with his thiking as i feel we are Final Four bound.
|
|
|
Post by TexasBlue on Jun 21, 2002 21:09:59 GMT -5
I agree we are a final four team. Has Maryland dropped off that much that they are not even ranked?
|
|
|
Post by KY Kid on Jun 21, 2002 21:46:57 GMT -5
Yeah, they lost Dixon, Wilcox, and Baxter. That's a lot to fill.
|
|
|
Post by 4uktrey on Jun 21, 2002 23:00:37 GMT -5
Duke shouldnt have made the 12 for the simple fact they lost over 75% of there scoring. Duhon hasnt lived up to his billing. And the ACC is alot stronger top to bottom. Thats why Maryland has dropped, and rightfully so. JMO. ED
|
|
|
|
Post by KY Kid on Jun 22, 2002 23:13:43 GMT -5
Oh yeah, I forgot about Mouton who was also a very big contributor.
|
|
|
Post by SuperSport1 on Jun 25, 2002 8:26:46 GMT -5
Mouton had a monster game against us! Inconsistency with these polls.... Vitale has us 4th and Mark Button( ) has us 19th. I would like to see these two sit down and explain their choices. Although Pitt did not play a tough non conference schedule last season, other than Ohio State (and Pitt won), they did have impressive wins during conference play. I don't think they are top 5, but top 10 yes.
|
|
|
Post by KY Kid on Jun 25, 2002 8:30:52 GMT -5
I too believe they're way overrated. I think they'll be a one year wonder.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jun 25, 2002 9:34:29 GMT -5
|
|