|
|
Post by TheSpectre on Feb 15, 2007 10:49:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by SaulsHairstylist on Feb 15, 2007 11:12:30 GMT -5
Wow. Very true article.
|
|
|
|
Post by wildcatbraniac on Feb 15, 2007 13:38:49 GMT -5
"The Cats are 40-20 over the last two years. They are 16-11 in the SEC."
That is absolutely pitiful and illustrates the direction our program is heading...
|
|
|
|
Post by SaulsHairstylist on Feb 15, 2007 17:51:37 GMT -5
Ha. I could run a clean program too if all it required of me was signing a bunch of kids not even in the top 30.
|
|
|
|
Post by UKats56 on Feb 15, 2007 18:15:53 GMT -5
So are you implying that in order to get the top 30 recruits you have to play dirty?
Thad Matta?
|
|
|
|
Post by SaulsHairstylist on Feb 15, 2007 19:26:24 GMT -5
So are you implying that in order to get the top 30 recruits you have to play dirty? Thad Matta? Not at all. But some say Tubby is too clean to land top talent. I am mocking the argument. |
|
|
|
Post by CatDaddy on Feb 15, 2007 19:41:19 GMT -5
A sadly accurate read,  -D |
|
|
|
Post by blue2dabone on Feb 16, 2007 7:13:20 GMT -5
Ha. I could run a clean program too if all it required of me was signing a bunch of kids not even in the top 30. So what does that say about Williams, Mata, K, et. al.? Are you suggesting that everyone who lands top 30 players is breaking the rules? Or are you simply implying that you have to break rules to land players in the top 30? |
|
|
|
Post by BGCatfan on Feb 16, 2007 14:01:28 GMT -5
UK may be held to a different standard than those top-tier programs. Tubby probably knows that any hint of a recruiting infraction will draw down the wrath of the NCAA. Coach K doesn't have to worry, and Roy's experience at Kansas tells him that he can get by with a wrist slap.
|
|
|
|
Post by SaulsHairstylist on Feb 16, 2007 17:25:43 GMT -5
Ha. I could run a clean program too if all it required of me was signing a bunch of kids not even in the top 30. So what does that say about Williams, Mata, K, et. al.? Are you suggesting that everyone who lands top 30 players is breaking the rules? Or are you simply implying that you have to break rules to land players in the top 30? Did you miss my reply to UKats 56? You must have. For one who accuses others of not reading full posts, you sure are guilty of it yourself.    |
|
|
|
Post by blue2dabone on Feb 16, 2007 17:52:53 GMT -5
So what does that say about Williams, Mata, K, et. al.? Are you suggesting that everyone who lands top 30 players is breaking the rules? Or are you simply implying that you have to break rules to land players in the top 30? Did you miss my reply to UKats 56? You must have. For one who accuses others of not reading full posts, you sure are guilty of it yourself. I did indeed miss it. Point conceded.  |
|
|
|
Post by tcot on Feb 21, 2007 13:53:16 GMT -5
I agree another article another truth.
|
|
